Ex Parte KLIPPEL et al - Page 5




             Appeal No. 2001-1378                                                                                    
             Application No. 08/832,571                                                                              

                    (ii) a nucleotide sequence encoding a derivative or mutant of (a)(i) having single               
             or multiple nucleotide substitutions, deletions or additions, said sequence encoding said               
             derivative or mutant of (a)(i) having at least 50% identity to a native nucleotide                      
             sequence encoding p110, said derivative or mutant having 60-90% sequence identity to                    
             the native amino acid sequence of the p110 subunit of PI 3-kinase and an activity of the                
             p110 subunit of PI 3-kinase protein; and                                                                
                    (b) a second nucleotide sequence comprising a sequence encoding a cell                           
             membrane targeting sequence, said second sequence being attached to the 5' or 3' end                    
             of said first sequence.                                                                                 
                    In interpreting claim 1, we note the open ended claim language “comprising” both                 
             in the preamble of the claim and in the description of the first nucleotide sequence                    
             leaves the polynucleotide sequence (fusion protein) open to the inclusion of additional                 
             components.  The term “comprising” is inclusive and does not exclude additional,                        
             unrecited elements or method steps.  Moleculon Research Corp. v. CBS, Inc.,  793 F.2d                   
             1261, 229 USPQ 805 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 (1987).                                


             35 U.S.C. ' 103                                                                                         
                    Claims 1-9, 15-16, 22-30 and 33-34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                    
             obvious over Hu in view of Kapeller, Varticovski and Aronheim.                                          




                                                         5                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007