Ex Parte KLIPPEL et al - Page 6




             Appeal No. 2001-1378                                                                                    
             Application No. 08/832,571                                                                              

                    In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. ' 103, the examiner bears the initial burden                 
             of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.  See In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531,                     
             1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  A prima facie case of obviousness is                      
             established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested                 
             the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art.  In re Bell, 991 F.2d              
             781, 783, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  An obviousness analysis requires                      
             that the prior art both suggest the claimed subject matter and reveals a reasonable                     
             expectation of success to one reasonably skilled in the art.  In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488,                
             493, 20 USPQ2d 1438, 1442 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                             
                    It is the examiner=s position that (Answer, page 3-4):                                           
                    Hu et al. disclose the p110* construct, which comprises DNA encoding the                         
                    p110 subunit of PI 3-kinase and the iSH2 portion of the p85 subunit,                             
                    attached via a “glycine kinker [sic]” (See Fig. 1, page 100).  In the                            
                    disclosed p110* construct, the nucleotide sequences encoding the Myc-                            
                    tagged p110 subunit and the iSH2 portion of the p85 subunit having a                             
                    “glycine kinker [sic]” at the COOH terminus also represent nucleotide                            
                    sequences encoding for a derivative or mutant of the wild type p110                              
                    subunit and a portion of the wild type p85 subunit, respectively, as                             
                    encompassed in certain embodiments of the instantly claimed invention...                         
                    The p110* DNA construct and various derivatives thereof were transiently                         
                    transfected and expressed in COS-7 cells....  Immunoprecipitates of                              
                    transfected cells’ lysates containing the enzyme were analyzed for the                           
                    expression level and for the PI-3 kinase activity via the production of [32P]                    
                    PI-3 phosphate (PIP).  The encoded p110* protein is found to be a                                
                    constitutively active form of PI 3-kinase. ...                                                   
                    Hu et al. do not teach a construct further comprising DNA encoding a                             
                    membrane targeting sequence.  However, Kapeller et al. teach that                                
                    localization of PI 3-kinase to the plasma membrane is expected to                                
                    increase the 3-kinase activity, since it brings the enzyme into closer                           
                    contact with its substrates... Varticovski et al. also teach that PI 3-kinase                    

                                                         6                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007