The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GARRY B. TAKLE, ALLAN R. GOLDBERG, and SHAJI T. GEORGE __________ Appeal No. 2001-14981 Application No. 08/912,378 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-16 and 33, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claims 1 and 9 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 1. A method for delivering a nucleic acid to a bacterial cell, the method comprising bringing into contact the bacterial cell and a composition comprising the nucleic acid and a macrocycle having a net positive charge in an amount effective to enhance delivery of the nucleic acid to the bacterial cell. 1 This appeal is related to Appeal No. 2001-1705 (Application No. 08/616,141) accordingly we have considered these two appeals together.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007