Appeal No. 2001-2251 Page 8
Application No. 09/345,857
(3) Whether further consideration of the patentability of any of the appealed claims is
justified in light of (1) and (2).
Upon completion of the above, the examiner should take whatever action is
deemed appropriate in order to resolve any outstanding questions of patentability of the
appealed claims in light of the prior art.
In addition, we note that 37 CFR § 1.83 (a) has not been complied with, in that
the claimed combination of a package and a disposable consumer product has not
been illustrated in the drawings.
SUMMARY
None of the rejections are sustained.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007