Appeal No. 2001-2320
Application 09/097,295
view of either Palmer or Ito and the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
rejection of dependent claims 2 through 14 and 17 through 25, 27
through 29 and 31 as being unpatentable over Steenstrup in view
of either Palmer or Ito. The appellant has not challenged these
rejections with any reasonable specificity, thereby allowing the
dependent claims to stand or fall with their respective
independent parent claims. See In re Nielson, 816 F.2d 1567,
1572, 2 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1987).
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007