Appeal No. 2002-0021 Application No. 09/417,439 Absent the disclosure of the present application, it is our opinion that one of ordinary skill in the art would not have been motivated to modify the valve of Brehm in the particular manner urged by the examiner so as to arrive at the subject matter set forth in appellant’s claims 1 through 7 on appeal. Thus, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 7 as being unpatentable over Brehm in view of Bosch GmbH. In accordance with the foregoing, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 7 of the present application under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007