Appeal No. 2002-0405 Application No. 07/325,269 2. The Rule 131 Declarations In the event that the appellants attempt to swear behind the publication date of Wu, i.e., March 2, 1987, we note the following deficiencies in the Rule 131 declarations. In order to establish invention prior to the effective date of a reference, the declarant must “establish reduction to practice prior to the effective date of the reference, or conception of the invention prior to the effective date of the reference coupled with due diligence from prior to said date to a subsequent reduction to practice or to the filing of the application.” 37 CFR § 1.131. The declaration filed October 20, 1995 under 37 CFR § 1.131 is insufficient to establish a date of invention prior to March 2, 1987. The declaration relies on events which were documented in an Invention Disclosure. See Oct. 20, 1995 Declaration, paragraphs 4 & 5. However, the Invention Disclosure itself is not provided as an exhibit. The declarants state that one of the inventors discussed the “invention” with scientists on or about February 10, 1987. Id. at paragraph 5. Declarants further allege that the inventors worked “as time and budget allowed throughout February and early March” until completion of the experiments described in Exhibit 1 of their previous declaration. Id. at paragraph 6. These statements alone do not establish due 18Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007