Ex Parte KIRKWOOD et al - Page 18



          Appeal No. 2002-0405                                                          
          Application No. 07/325,269                                                    

               2.  The Rule 131 Declarations                                            
               In the event that the appellants attempt to swear behind the             
          publication date of Wu, i.e., March 2, 1987, we note the                      
          following deficiencies in the Rule 131 declarations.  In order to             
          establish invention prior to the effective date of a reference,               
          the declarant must “establish reduction to practice prior to the              
          effective date of the reference, or conception of the invention               
          prior to the effective date of the reference coupled with due                 
          diligence from prior to said date to a subsequent reduction to                
          practice or to the filing of the application.”  37 CFR § 1.131.               
          The declaration filed October 20, 1995 under 37 CFR § 1.131 is                
          insufficient to establish a date of invention prior to March 2,               
          1987.  The declaration relies on events which were documented in              
          an Invention Disclosure.  See Oct. 20, 1995 Declaration,                      
          paragraphs 4 & 5.  However, the Invention Disclosure itself is                
          not provided as an exhibit.  The declarants state that one of the             
          inventors discussed the “invention” with scientists on or about               
          February 10, 1987.  Id. at paragraph 5.  Declarants further                   
          allege that the inventors worked “as time and budget allowed                  
          throughout February and early March” until completion of the                  
          experiments described in Exhibit 1 of their previous declaration.             
          Id. at paragraph 6.  These statements alone do not establish due              
                                          18                                            




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007