Appeal No. 2002-1183 Application 08/975,549 Thus, the appellants’ position on appeal that their invention is patentable over Littlebury is not persuasive. We shall therefore sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claims 28 through 32, and dependent claims 33 through 42, as being unpatentable over Littlebury. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 28 through 42 is affirmed. AFFIRMED JOHN P. MCQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) ) APPEALS AND JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JPM/kis 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007