Appeal No. 2002-1992 Application 09/206,170 the solution, and double sided scrubbing the wafer with water either before or after immersing the wafer in the solution. Claim 13: Claim 10 of Schonauer ‘727, which depends from claim 9, recites that the barrier layer comprises tantalum nitride. Claims 17 and 18: Claim 16 of Schonauer ‘727, which includes the subject matter of claims 13 and 14, claims a method of preventing the growth of dendrites emanating from Cu or Cu alloy lines into a bordering open dielectric field on a wafer surface, by immersing the wafer in a solution containing at least about 90 wt% acetic acid and up to about 10 wt% ammonium fluoride to remove a portion of dielectric material from the surface of the open dielectric field and from between the lines. DECISION The rejections of claims 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, claims 1, 3, 6-9, 11-14 and 17-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Chen in view of Grieger, and claims 2, 5, 10, 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Chen in view of Grieger and Schonauer, are reversed. Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b) a new ground of rejection of claims 1, 3, 6, 10-13, 17 and 18 has been entered. 16Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007