Interference No. 104,101
Page 16
F36. Lilly has provided the panel with a copy of the Lilly Submission Sheet for Serial No.
311583. (EX 1216, Bates No. 3114). The submitted copy is difficult to read. For example, the
submission sheet contains the notation “Insuff. Mat.” next to an illegible typeprint.
F37. The Serial No. 311583 submission sheet depicts the same structure as that depicted on
page 266 of Mr. Cullinan’s notebook. Similarly, the submission sheet contains the lot no. C12-
AMF-266, and twice mentions Mr. Cullinan name. The 311583 submission sheet, like page 266
of Mr. Cullinan’s notebook, contains the following notations: 1) “C28H29NO3S • HCl” (the
empirical formula for the depicted structure); 2) “496.07” (the molecular weight of the depicted
compound); and 3) “330 mg” (the alleged amount of product formed by Mr. Cullinan).
Moreover, the submission sheet refers to the dates “17 March 93” and “1 April 93.”
F38. The submission sheet fails to demonstrate that Mr. Cullinan produced the depicted
structure. The submission sheet does not appear to contain any data from any of the analytical
tests said to be requested by Mr. Cullinan. At best, the legible portions of the submission sheet
indicate that the depicted compound has a molecular weight of 496.07 and has the empirical
formula C28H29NO3S • HCl. Even if the information in these notations was correct, the
compounds are not limited to the specific structure depicted. Furthermore, the record is unclear
as to whether the stated molecular weight and empirical formula are the expected values based on
the depicted structure or whether they represent the results of the tests said to have been
requested by Mr. Cullinan.
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007