grating mask.
6. Count 2 2, the sole count of the interference is as
follows:
A method of fabricating a Bragg grating in the interior of
an optical waveguide comprising disposing a phase grating
mask adjacent and parallel to a photosensitive optical
waveguide and applying a single collimating light beam
through the mask to said waveguide.
7. The claims of the parties are:
Anderson: 1-8
Hill: 1-24
Snitzer: 11-23 and 25-39
8. The claims of the parties that are designated as
corresponding to Count 2' are:
Anderson: 1, 2 and 5-8
Hill: 1, 5-11 and 17-23
Snitzer: 11-23 and 25-39
9. The claims of the parties that are designated as not
corresponding to Count 2 4 are:
Anderson: 3 and 4
Hill: 2-4, 12-16 and 24
Snitzer: none
2 Count 2 was substituted for the original count 1. (Paper
209).
3 See Paper 209.
4 See Paper 209.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007