(HR 52-53 and 88).
49. To establish the 8 September 1992 date, Hill relies on
a receipt received by it from Sandra Cooperman (Cooperman)
indicating that the Hill manuscript had been received by the
Annual Review Office.
50. The receipt has a date stamped SEP 08 1992, with the
words "We acknowledge with thanks the receipt of your manuscript
for the Annual Review of MATERIALS SCIENCE".
51. The receipt is signed "Sincerely yours, ANNUAL REVIEWS
INC., Sandra Cooperman (Production Editor)".
52. Cooperman has been the Production Editor for the Annual
Review of Materials Science (Annual Review) since prior to May
1992.
53. As Production Editor, Cooperman is responsible for
organizing and orchestrating an entire series, or volume for the
Annual Review (HR 230, line 16 to HR 231, line 7).
54. As further evidence of its date of conception, Hill has
submitted into evidence a marked-up copy of the Hill manuscript
with SEP 08 1992 stamped on the front page (HR 93).
55. Cooperman testified that when a manuscript arrived at
the Annual Review Office, the manuscript was stamped with the day
it was received an the front page of the manuscript (HR 270,
lines 2-23).
Actual Reduction to Practice
56. Hill relies on its manuscript as an actual reduction to
12
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007