M
editor(s) to be read;
d) after the manuscript was received by the office, a
receipt for the manuscript was sent to the authors;
e) the manuscript was copy-edited in-house and sent to the
editor or one of the associate editors for review;
f) the authors then received the manuscript to make
comments, ask questions, etc. (HR 214-216).
76. During cross-examination, Cooperman again testified
that for Volume 23 a copy of each manuscript for the keynote
topic'O was sent to each guest editor (HR 265, lines 9-10; HR
271, lines 15-17).
77. Although Cooperman testified affirmatively that she
would have only sent copies of the manuscript to Dr. Laudise, if
he had so requested, she also testified that she did not think
that she sent the Hill manuscript only to Dr. Laudise and not to
Dr. Snitzer (HR 277, lines 1-23).
78. A fax dated "3/3/9311 was sent to Cooperman with an
insert "A" made by Dr. Snitzer which is part of the introduction
to Volume 23 of the Annual Review of Materials Science (Snitzer
Ex. 3035).
79. Hill argues that from the content of the insert, it is
clear that Dr. Snitzer read the Hill manuscript (Paper 311 at
10 There is no dispute that the Hill manuscript was for a
keynote topic.
16
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007