Interference No. 104,693
Preputnick v. Provencher
11. Junior party Preputnick filed preliminary motions 1, 2
and 3: (1) Preliminary Motion 1 alleging that senior party
Provencher's claims 17-19 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) for anticipation by Japanese Utility Model Application
6-88065 (Hashiguchi); (2) Preliminary Motion 2 alleging that
senior party Provencher's claims 17-19 are unpatentable under
3S U.S.C. § 103 over various combinations of prior art
references; and (3) Preliminary Motion 3 alleging that senior
party's claims 17-19 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as lacking written description in the
specification.
12. Junior party Preputnick has not filed any preliminary
motion to attack the benefit accorded senior party Provencher at
the commencement of this interference.
13. Senior party Provencher filed preliminary motions I and
2: (1) Preliminary Motion 1 attacking the benefit accorded
junior party's involved patent; and (2) Preliminary Motion 2
alleging that junior party Preputnick's claims 12-14 are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by U.S.
Patent No. 5,702,258, and that junior party Preputnick's claims
9-11 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over
U.S. Patent No. 5,702,258 in view of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,705,332
and 5,224,867.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007