Interference No. 104,693 Preputnick v. Provencher 20. Hashiguchi does not disclose complementary fastening portions on its modules 1 and 2 which engage each other to secure the modules together. See explanation in the discussion section of this opinion. 21. Provencher's specification describes the following features of Provencher's claim 17 (see explanation in the discussion section of this opinion): providing a first lead frame having said first contacts; providing a second lead frame having said second contacts; overmolding said intermediate portions of said first contacts in said first lead frame with insulating material, overmolding said intermediate portions of said second contacts in said second lead frame with insulating material; 22. Hashiguchils disclosure does not ýteach away" from having complementary fastening portions an its modules 1 and 2 which act to engage each other to secure the modules together. See explanation in the discussion section of this opinion. 23. U.S. Patent No. 5j171,161 (ýthe Kachlic patent") discloses complementary fastening portions on contiguous modules, which act to engage each other to secure the modules together. See explanation in the discussion section of this opinion. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007