Interference No. 104,693
Preputnick v. Provencher
14. Junior party Preputnick filed no opposition or any
other response to Senior party Provencher's preliminary motions 1
and 2.
15. Junior party Preputnick's preliminary statement states
that the invention of the count was conceived as early as
June 10, 1996.
16. Junior party Preputnick's alleged date of conception is
subsequent to the accorded benefit date of senior party
Provencher.
17. On page 8, lines 3-5 of Provencher's specification, it
is stated: ýThe same contacts 410A . . . 41OF can be used to
make [e]ither wafers 112 or 114. The only difference is in the
housing molded around the contacts." That means each physical
set of contacts 410A - 41OF can be used to make either, not both,
wafers 112 and 114.
18. The level of ordinary skill in the art with respect to
the subject matter of the count is represented by that comparable
to a Bachelor degree in electrical engineering, mechanical
engineering, or physics, and 3 to 8 years of actual experience in
developing electrical connectors.
19. Provencher's claim 17 includes the step of: 'securing
said first and second half-modules together by engaging
complementary fastening portions to define said terminal module."
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007