Ex Parte FORSTOVA et al - Page 1



                                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                               
                                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                        


                                                                                                                 Paper No. 31                       



                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 
                                                                         


                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 
                                                                          
                                                        AND IN'TERFERENCES 
                                                                        

                                                                                                        MAILED                                      
                                                        Ex parte JITKA FORSTOVA,                                                                    
                                                         BEVERLY E. GRIFFIN, and                                                                    
                                                           NINA S. KRAUZEWICZ                            JUL,22 2002                                
                                                                                                         PAT. & T.M. OFFICE                         
                                                                                                      ~ARDOFINTERFEP''PATENT APP'                         
                                                            Appeal NO. 1998-0667                                                                    
                                                         Application No. 081280,306                                                                 

                                                           HEARD: April 11,2002                                                                     

                  Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judqes.                                                       
                  WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judqe.                                                                                    
                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                       
                          This is a decision in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of                                         
                  claims 1 through 9, 13, 18 through 22, 25, 26, and 28 through 32. Subsequent to the                                               
                  final rejection, the examiner determined that claim 26 is free of rejection and has only                                          
                  objected to that claim. In addition, claim 27 is pending and is also objected to by the                                           
                  examiner.                                                                                                                         








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007