Appeal No. 1998-0667 Page 10 Application No. 081280,306 the exogenous material, i.e., DNA, into a host cell so that the DNA was taken up by the cell and was biologically functional in the cell. The examiner agrees with appellants that the results reported in Sandig indicate that the pseudocapsids formed of VP1 were unable to transfer the associated DNA into a host cell so that the DNA was biologically functional. The examiner argues in the paragraph bridging pages 15-1 6 of the Examiner's Answer in responding to appellants' arguments: There are two possible explanations for the difference in the results obtained by Sandig et al. and Appellants. One explanation is that Appellants discovered how to use the particles of Sandig et al. to transfer and express DNA in cells. But 'discovery of an unobvious property and use does not overcome the statutory restraint of section 102 when the claimed composition is known' (In re Spada, p. 1658). The second possible explanation is that Appellants discovered a new method for making pseudocapsids andlor associating DNA therewith, which somehow changes the physical properties of the composition. If this is the case, the claim does not incorporate whatever process of manufacture might distinguish the claimed composition from that disclosed by Sandig et al. This issue car1 be readily resolved by simple reference to Sandig and the present specification. In reporting the results concerning ,the pseudocapsids consisting of VP1 , Sandig states that the results are "consistent with electron microscopy data showing only particles adsorbed to the cell surface." In other words, the pseudocapsids described in Sandig and relied upon by the exarrliner in support of this rejection had the exogenous DNA adsorbed to the pseudocapsid surface and not contained therein. In contrast to this description of the particles of Sandig, the present specification states: By the exogenous rrlaterial being 'associated with' the pseudocapsid, we mean that the material is protected thereby. For example, exogenous DNA will be protected frorrl degradation by DNases such as DNasel, and exogenous protein will be protected frorrl proteases. The exogenousPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007