Appeal No. 1999-1602
Application No. 08/776,957
CONCLUSION
We have affirmed the rejection of claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. We have reversed the rejection of claims 3 and 8 under the same statute. The
examiner’s decision in rejecting claims 2-5 and 7-10 is thus affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007