Ex parte CODAMA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1647                                                         
          Application 08/934,088                                                       

                         wherein said image sensor element and said                    
               driver element have respective active layers made from                  
               the same semiconductor film,                                            
                         wherein each of said plurality of thin film                   
               transistors includes a semiconductor island having an                   
               upper surface and side surfaces and a gate insulating                   
               film covering said upper surface and side surfaces of                   
               said semiconductor island, and                                          
                         wherein said gate insulating film of said part                
               of the plurality of thin film transistor is thicker than                
               said gate insulating film of said another part of the                   
               plurality of thin film transistor.                                      
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                        
               Tasch, Jr. et al. (Tasch)      4,409,724     October 18,                
          1983                                                                         
               Wieder et al. (Wieder)         4,823,180       April 18,                
          1989                                                                         
               Okamoto et al. (Okamoto)            5,343,066      August               
          30, 1994                                                                     
               Claims 17-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Wieder and Tasch.                                    
               Claims 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Wieder, Tasch, and Okamoto.                          
               We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 28) (pages                   
          referred to as "FR__") and the examiner's answer (Paper                      
          No. 33) (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the                 
          Examiner's position, and to the brief (Paper No. 32) (pages                  
          referred to as "Br__") and the reply brief (Paper No. 35)                    

                                        - 3 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007