The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte YUN JUN HUH, SUK BIN HAN, and JAE JEONG KIM _____________ Appeal No. 1999-1674 Application No. 08/923,949 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before PAK, LIEBERMAN, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 5, 15, 17 and 19. Claim 5 was amended subsequent to the final Office action dated June 9, 1998. Claims 6 through 14, the remaining claims in the above-identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007