Appeal No. 1999-2115
Application No. 08/724,574
view of Rao, (ii) claim 5 as unpatentable over Yu '834 in view
of Rao and Tang, (iii) claim 7 as unpatentable over Yu '834 in
view of Rao and Morimoto, (iv) claims 9 through 12 and 15
through 20 as unpatentable over Yu '534 in view of Rao, (v)
claim 13 as unpatentable over Yu '534 in view of Rao and Tang,
and (vi) claim 14 as unpatentable over Yu '534 in view of Rao
and Morimoto are reversed.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PAUL LIEBERMAN )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ROMULO H. DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
RHD/kis
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007