Ex Parte HOLMGREN et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 1999-2634                                                                                         
              Application No. 08/108,606                                                                                   

              Svennerholm, A.M., et al. (Svennerholm), ADevelopment of oral vaccines against                               
              enterotoxinogenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea,@   Vaccine, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 196-198                         
              (1989)                                                                                                       
              Solderlind, et al. (Soderlind), AEffect of Parenteral Vaccination of Dams on Intestinal                      
              Escherichia coli in Piglets with Diarrhea,@ Infection and Immunity, Vol. 36, pp. 900- 906                    
              (1982)                                                                                                       
              Gregory, et al (Gregory), ALamb model in the study of immunity to enteropathogenic                           
              Escherichia coli infections,@ American Journal of Veterinary Research, Vo. 44, p. 2073                       
              (1983)                                                                                                       
              Evans, et al. (Evans 2), AHemmagglutination of Human Group A Erythrocytes by                                 
              Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Adults with Diarrhea:   Correlation with                      
              Colonization Factor,@  Infection and Immunity, Vol. 18, p. 330 (1977)                                        
              Evans, et al. (Evans 3), AAdministration of Purified Colonization Factor Antigens (CFA/I,                    
              CFA/II) of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to Volunteers,@  Gastroenterology, Vol. 87,                      
              pp. 934 (1984)                                                                                               

              Claim Grouping                                                                                               
                     According to appellants, the claims stand or fall together in the following groups:                   
              Group 1, claims 7, 8, 10, 11 and 16;  Group 2, claim 9; Group 3, claim 11; Group 4,                          
              Claims 13 and 14; Group 5, claim 17 and Group 6, claims 15, 18 and 19.  (Brief, page                         
              5).  We decide this appeal on the basis of claim 7 as representative of claims 7-11, 16                      
              and 17; and Claim 13 as representative of the claims 13-15, 18 and 19.  In re Young,                         
              927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                    
              Grounds of Rejection                                                                                         
                     Claims 7, 8, 10 and 13-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 over Evans 1 in                        
              view of Svennerholm, and Soderlind or Gregory and Myers.                                                     

                                                            3                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007