Appeal No. 1999-2640 Application 08/918,267 texture mapping and broadly shows generating a texture value for each position on the seat back. Claim 1 does not preclude generating a texture value for each position on the seat back by texture mapping and claim 1 does not require use of an evaluation function. However, since Kato lacks the earlier steps of claim 1, it cannot satisfy this last step. As previously noted, the Examiner seems to find that Kato teaches generating textures as recited in claim 1, but does not do so "by surface rendering surface color information based on position values generated for each position" as recited in the narrower claim 4, which is not at issue. Nevertheless, we consider the teachings of Foley and Thier. Appellant argues that Foley describes the use of prefiltering before sampling, or postfiltering after sampling, to perform anti-aliasing of a displayed image and all that would result from Foley would be perhaps a better rendering of the lines in the mapped picture of Fig. 6C (Br5-6). It is argued that the Examiner is in error in asserting that Foley teaches application of filtering to "texture generation" and there is no illustration or discussion of texture generation - 9 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007