The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROMI YAMASHITA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2691
Application No. 08/590,348
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4 through
7.
The disclosed invention relates to an image signal processing
apparatus.
Claims 4 and 7 are illustrative of the claimed invention, and
they read as follows:
4. An image signal processing apparatus, comprising:
an image sensor for reading an image and outputting image data
representing the read image as an image data signal;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007