GOODALL et al v. SUWA et al. - Page 1




                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being                                            
                                              entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                                                               Paper 46                                 
                Filed by:  Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                                    
                       Box Interference                                        Filed: October 31, 2002                                  
                Washington, D.C.  20231                                                                                                  
                Tel:  703-308-9797                                                                                                       
                Fax:  703-305-0942                                                                                                       
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                      BRIAN L. GOODALL, SAIKUMAR JAYARAMAN,                                                              
                                            ROBERT A. SHICK, LARRY F. RHODES                                                             
                                                             Junior Party                                                                
                                     (Patent 6,136,499 and U.S. Application No. 10/079,2181),                                            
                                                                   v.                                                                    
                                              MITSUHITO SUWA, TORU KAJITA,                                                               
                                          SHIN-ICHIRO IWANAGA, TOSHIYUKI OTA                                                             
                                                             Senior Party,                                                               
                                                      (Application 08/797,620).                                                          
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                                   Patent Interference No. 104,703                                                       
                                                          _______________                                                                
                Before: SPIEGEL, TIERNEY and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    
                                                        FINAL JUDGMENT                                                                   
                                                 (Decision on Preliminary Motions)                                                       
                        This interference is before a merits panel for a decision on preliminary motions.  As                            
                evident from the discussion below, no oral hearing on the merits was required.                                           

                        1The caption for this interference has been changed to reflect the addition of Goodall’s                         
                U.S. Application 10/079,218 to the interference.                                                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007