Interference No. 104,703
Page No. 4
C. The Count and Claim Correspondence
A primary concern reflected in the parties’ motions is the scope of the count in
interference and the claim correspondence. The count and claim correspondence coming into
this decision is provided below.
F5. Count 1, the sole count in interference prior to this decision, read as follows:
A composition according to any one of claims 1, 4, 6, 7 and 12 of U.S. Patent 6,136,499
or
A composition according to claim 2 of U.S. Application 08/797,620
F6. At the time of declaration, the parties’ claims were as follows:
Goodall, U.S. Patent No. 6,136,499: 1-12
Suwa, U.S. Application 08/797,620: 2-22
F7. The claims of the parties which corresponded to Count 1 were:
Goodall, U.S. Patent No. 6,136,499: 1-12
Suwa, U.S. Application 08/797,620: 2-22
F8. The claims of the parties which did not correspond to Count 1, and therefore were not
involved in the interference, were:
Goodall, U.S. Patent No. 6,136,499: None
Suwa, U.S. Application 08/797,620: None
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007