The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILIP S. RESNIK, GARY R. ADAMS,
ROBERT J. KUHNS AND MARK C. TORRANCE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0728
Application No. 08/687,886
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 30.
The disclosed invention relates to the conversion of a source language to a target language
via multilingual assistance in a computer system.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:
1. A method executed in a computer system for providing multilingual assistance, the
method comprising the steps of:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007