Appeal No. 2001-0728
Application No. 08/687,886
receiving text;
breaking the text into at least one piece;
identifying a source language in which each piece of the text is written; and
converting words or phrases in each piece of the text into equivalent words or phrases in a
target language.
The references relied on by the examiner in prior art rejections are:
Hashimoto et al. (Hashimoto) 4,597,055 Jun. 24, 1986
Fujita 5,612,872 Mar. 18, 1997
(filed Apr. 12, 1995)
Brown et al. (Brown) 5,768,603 Jun. 16, 1998
(filed Jun. 2, 1995)
Claims 1 through 12 and 15 through 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being
anticipated by Brown.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brown in
view of Fujita.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brown in
view of Fujita and Hashimoto.
Reference is made to the final rejection (paper number 8) the brief (paper number 10) and
the answer (paper number 11) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007