The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 44 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte STEFANO MARULLO, COLETTE DELAVIER, LAURENT EMORINE, and DONNY STROSBERG __________ Appeal No. 2001-1436 Application No. 08/422,612 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 16-25, 41, and 44-53, all of the claims remaining. Claim 41 is representative and reads as follows: 41. A yeast cell stably transformed with an expression vector comprising: (a) an insert encoding a mammalian receptor comprising seven hydrophobic transmembrane segments, extracellular and intracellular loops, an extracellular amino terminal region, and a carboxyl terminal cytoplasmic region; andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007