Ex Parte CHEN - Page 9




              Appeal No. 2001-1880                                                                                         
              Application No. 09/273,835                                                                                   
              normally occur in DNAs, [oligodeoxynucleotides] ODNs or PNA's such that the                                  
              nucleotide segment or PNS has specific, stable, or long lived radioactive isotope of a                       
              specified selected element at a terminal or interior position; hybridizing the labeled                       
              nucleotide segment or PNA to complementary nucleic acid segments or PNAs which                               
              are fixed on a hybridization surface; and, using mass spectrometric techniques,                              
              including RIS, to analyze the presence and position of the labeled hybridized nucleotide                     
              segments or PNAs which are bound to the fixed nucleotide segments or PNAs.”                                  
              Arlinghaus particularly mentions tin and rare earth isotopes, and isotopes attached to                       
              DNA fragments or ODNs..  Columns 2, 5 and 6.   Claim 1 of Arlinghaus indicates that                          
              the isotopes are of an element that does not normally occur in DNAs or ODNs.  Column                         
              7, lines 57-59.                                                                                              
                     In response, appellant argues that the examiner fails to establish a prima facie                      
              case of anticipation because the claimed invention requires “isotopic labeling of all of                     
              one type of atom in a chosen nucleotide unit, for example, all of the carbon atoms.”                         
              Brief, page 8. In addition, appellant argues the claimed invention differs from the                          
              disclosure of Arlinghaus in that,  “[n]o atoms are introduced that do not normally occur,                    
              and no atoms are attached to a nucleotide.”  Id.  Appellant argues that this                                 
              interpretation of the claim language is supported by the meaning of “isotope labeled                         
              form” in the specification at page 8, lines 2-12; page 9, lines 5-15 and Table 1 of the                      
              specification.  Id.                                                                                          



                                                            9                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007