Appeal No. 2001-1880
Application No. 09/273,835
the claims is reversed.
CONCLUSION
In view of the above, the rejections of claims 1-3, 6-10 and 13 under 35 U.S.C.
102 as anticipated by Arlinghaus; claims 1-4, 6-11 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as
obvious over Arlinghaus in view of Rothberg; and claims 1-26 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as
obvious over Arlinghaus and Rothberg in view of Lizardi are reversed.
REVERSED
)
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TONI R. SCHEINER )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
DEMETRA J. MILLS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007