Appeal No. 2001-2182 11 Application No. 08/948,895 The rejection of claims 6, 7 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Shankar in view of Sandhu, GB’345 and EP’283 is reversed. The rejection of claims 10 through 14 and 16 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Shankar in view of Sandhu, GB’345 and EP’283, and further in view of Endo is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PAUL LIEBERMAN ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007