Ex Parte CLARK et al - Page 1



                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                                                                                         Paper No. 20                

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   __________                                                        

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    __________                                                       
                                Ex parte JOSEPH A. CLARK and JANE A. YOUNG                                           
                                                   ___________                                                       
                                               Appeal No. 2001-2271                                                  
                                            Application No. 08/971,8391                                              
                                                    __________                                                       
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                    __________                                                       

             Before SCHEINER, ADAMS and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
             SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of                   
             claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-13 and 15, the only claims remaining in the application.                           
                    Claims 1, 2 and 3 are representative, and read as follows:                                       
                    1.  A method of treating aquatic animals by infusion of tissue cells thereof with a              
             biological agent dissolved within a body of water in a treatment zone within which said                 
             infusion is performed, the improvement residing in the steps of: establishing an acoustic               
             field of limited duration within said treatment zone during which said biological agent is              
             transferred to the tissue cells; and regulating conditions of the body of water within the              
             treatment zone to establish a constant temperature therein during said limited duration                 
             of the acoustic field under which said infusion occurs for absorption of the biological                 
             agent into the tissue cells.                                                                            
                    2.  The improvement as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of establishing an                   
             acoustic field comprises the steps of: generating steady state electrical signal energy                 

                    1 Application for patent filed November 17, 1997.                                                


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007