Ex Parte CLARK et al - Page 2



             Appeal No. 2001-2271                                                              Page 2                
             Application No. 08/971,839                                                                              
             having a frequency within a cavitation range; amplifying the steady state electrical signal             
             energy to an operative voltage level and converting said amplified electrical signal                    
             energy into acoustic energy for producing said acoustic field within the treatment zone.                
                    3.  The improvement as defined in claim 2 wherein said biological agent is                       
             selected from a group of tagging compounds consisting of calcein and oxytetracycline                    
             hydrochloride.                                                                                          
                    The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                    
             Zohar et al. (Zohar)                      5,076,208                  Dec. 31, 1991                      
             Heat Systems Ultrasonics, Inc., “Breaking the Heat Barrier,” Sonicator Series                           
             Application Notes, AN-1, pp. 1-2 (1977)                                                                 
             Monaghan, “Comparison of Calcein and Tetracycline as Chemical Markers in Summer                         
             Flounder,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 122, pp. 298-301                        
             (1993)                                                                                                  
             Mohler, “Immersion of Larval Atlantic Salmon in Calcein Solutions to Induce a Non-                      
             Lethally Detectable Mark,” North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 17,                     
             pp. 751-756 (1997)                                                                                      
                    Claims 1, 2, 7, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable                   
             over Zohar and Heat Systems Ultrasonics, while claims 3-5, 8, 12, 13 and 15 stand                       
             rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Zohar, Heat Systems Ultrasonics,                    
             Monaghan and Mohler.                                                                                    
                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The present invention is directed to a method of infusing aquatic animal tissues                 
             (e.g., fish eggs or larvae) with biological agents (e.g. chemical markers or DNA).                      
             Infusion of the biological agent is “performed within [a] treatment zone under an                       
             acoustic energy field of limited duration produced by amplification of a steady state                   
             electrical power signal converted into ultrasound waves within a cavitation frequency                   
             range establishing the acoustic field within the treatment zone” (Brief, page 2).  As                   
             explained in the specification, with reference to Figure 2, the “treatment zone”                        
             comprises water “enclosed by a cylindrical shaped transducer . . . [which] converts                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007