The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YA-CHIN KING,
TSU-JAE KING
and
CHEN-MING HU
__________
Appeal No. 2001-2590
Application No. 09/449,063
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WARREN, KRATZ and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-8 and 10-15. Claims 9 and 16-20 have been
cancelled. Thus, only claims 1-8 and 10-15 are before us on this
appeal.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS
The appellants have stated that the claims do not stand or
fall together. However, they have presented only single arguments
for each ground of rejection. Claims must be argued separately on
appeal or they stand or fall together. In re Dance, 160 F.3d
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007