Ex Parte KAHN et al - Page 8




          Appeal No. 2002-1148                                                         
          Application 09/471,662                                                       


          one thousand to several thousand volts (supplemental declaration,            
          page 2).  The examiner does not find Kaufman’s interpretation                
          convincing in view of Ceasar’s disclosure of using a Kaufman type            
          ion source to produce an ion beam having an energy of 0-2,000 eV             
          (answer, page 7).  Kaufman’s interpretation of “one to several               
          thousand volts” as meaning one thousand to several thousand volts            
          is entitled to significant weight since it is his own disclosure,            
          and the examiner has provided no evidence or reasoning which                 
          shows that Kaufman’s interpretation, which is a reasonable                   
          interpretation, is incorrect.  Moreover, as discussed above,                 
          Kaufman indicates in his declaration (pages 2-3) and supplemental            
          declaration (page 2) that sputtering using the ion source he                 
          invented and Ceasar uses is impossible at an ion beam energy at              
          or below about 50 eV unless the target has a negative bias, and              
          the examiner has provided no evidence or reasoning to the                    
          contrary.                                                                    
               The examiner argues that because Ceasar is presumed to be               
          valid, Ceasar can be presumed to be operative throughout the                 
          entire disclosed 0-2,000 eV ion beam energy range (answer,                   
          page 5).  Under 35 U.S.C. § 282, each claim of a patent is                   
          presumed to be valid.  The examiner’s argument is not well taken             
          because none of Ceasar’s claims requires an ion beam energy of               

                                          8                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007