Appeal No. 2002-1148
Application 09/471,662
For the above reasons we reverse the rejection of claim 8.
DECISION
The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 and 5 over
Ceasar in view of King, claim 2 over Ceasar in view of King and
Quazi, claims 3 and 4 over Ceasar in view of King and Arnold,
claim 3 over Ceasar in view of King, Quazi and Arnold, and
claims 6 and 7 over Ceasar in view of King, Quazi and Ion Beam
Neutralization, are affirmed. The rejection under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 of claim 8 over Ceasar in view of King is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007