The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. `Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MITSUSHI HIKIDA and MASAAKI HAYASHI __________ Appeal No. 2002-1575 Application No. 08/945,901 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, GREEN, MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 4, 5, 8-15, 21, and 24-30, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claim 4 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below: 4. A method for reducing postoperative astigmatism by increasing the strength of a wound closure site comprising administering to the eyes of a patient after sclerocorneal incision or corneal incision, a pharmaceutically effective amount of lactoferrin in a concentration of 0.1 to 1.05 (w/v). The reference relied upon by the examiner is: Mita et al. (Mita) 5,561,109 Oct. 1, 1996Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007