THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT GRAF and STEFAN KEIPL
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0078
Application No. 09/257,066
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-8 and 11-20. Claims 9 and 10, which are
all of the other claims pending in this application, have been
indicated as free of the prior art (allowable) by the examiner
(answer, page 3).
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention relates to a composition that
comprises a liquid foam extinguishing formulation. The
composition includes a film forming amphoteric surfactant, a foam
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007