Ex Parte GRAF et al - Page 2




          Appeal No.2003-0078                                        Page 2           
          Application No.09/257,066                                                   


          forming amphoteric surfactant, a frost proofing agent and a water           
          soluble ammonium salt.  An understanding of the invention can be            
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced            
          below.                                                                      
          1. A liquid foam extinguishing formulation comprising a water               
          soluble ammonium salt, a film-forming amphoteric fluorine                   
          surfactant, a foam-forming amphoteric co-surfactant, and a                  
          frostproofing agent, wherein the formulation is a stable,                   
          storable, ready to use, and frostproof single solution.                     
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Falk (Falk ‘967)              4,090,967      May  23, 1978                  
          Wirtz et al. (Wirtz)          4,203,850      May  20, 1980                  
          Falk (Falk ‘286)              4,472,286      Sep. 18, 1984                  
          Pennartz                      5,091,097      Feb. 25, 1992                  
          Barbarin et al. (Barbarin)    5,997,758      Dec. 07, 1999                  
                                             (102(e) date - Nov. 28, 1997)            
               Claims 1-4, 7, 8, 11-17, 19 and 20 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over either Falk ‘967 or              
          Falk ‘286.  Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over either Falk ‘967 or Falk ‘286 in view of            
          Wirtz.  Claims 1-8 and 11-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being unpatentable over Barbarin in view of Falk ‘967 or                 
          Pennartz.                                                                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007