Appeal No. 2003-0332 Application 09/057,383 As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following references: Williams 4,299,264 Nov. 10, 1981 Miller 4,456,046 Jun. 26, 1984 Shiraishi 5,054,530 Oct. 08, 1991 THE REJECTIONS The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 4, 9 to 11, 16, 17, 19 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Shiraishi; and claims 1 to 4, 9 to 11, 16, 17, 19 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Shiraishi, Williams and Miller.3 (Answer, p. 3). OPINION The Appellant submits that for each of the rejections, the claims are grouped together. (Brief, p. 3). Accordingly, claims 1 to 4, 9 to 11, 16, 17, 19 and 21 will stand or fall together. We will limit our discussion to claim 1 as representative of the rejected claims. See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(2001). 3 According to the Examiner, the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, has been withdrawn. (Answer, p. 3). - 3 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007