Ex Parte ACHACHE - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 29              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Ex parte MARC ACHACHE                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0552                                  
                               Application 09/190,318                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 19, 23, 27 and 31.  Although the final                  
          rejection (Paper No. 19) involved a rejection under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) of all of claims 17 through 32 then pending in the                 
          application, it is apparent from the record (e.g., Paper No. 22)            
          that appellant only seeks review of the examiner’s final                    
          rejection as it applies to dependent claims 19, 23, 27 and 31.              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007