Ex Parte ACHACHE - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2003-0552                                                        
          Application 09/190,318                                                      


          The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Fernandez                5,489,830           Feb. 6, 1996                   


          In addition to the foregoing prior art reference, the                       
          examiner has also relied upon applicant’s admitted prior art                
          (hereinafter, the APA) set forth on page 1 of the specification             
          in the “Background of the Invention” section.                               


          Claims 19, 23, 27 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                     
          §103(a) as being unpatentable over the APA in view of Fernandez.            


          Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's commentary                  
          with regard to the above-noted rejection and the conflicting                
          viewpoints advanced by appellant and the examiner regarding the             
          rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No.              
          19, mailed November 15, 2001) and the examiner's answer (Paper              
          No. 24, mailed July 16, 2002) for the reasoning in support of the           
          rejection, and to appellant’s brief (Paper No. 23, filed May 6,             
          2002) and reply brief (Paper No. 26, filed August 30, 2002) for             
          the arguments thereagainst.                                                 


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007