The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARIKLIA DELIGIANNI, JOHN OWEN DUKOVIC, DANIEL CHARLES
EDELSTEIN, WILMA JEAN HORKANS, CHAO-KUN HU, JEFFREY LOUIS HURD,
KENNETH PARKER RODBELL, CYPRIAN EMEKA UZOH and KWONG-HON WONG
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0623
Application No. 09/348,632
____________
HEARD: June 11, 2003
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CHUNG K. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, 8, 9, 11 through 25, 40 through 50 and 109 through 123. Claims 26 through 39
and 51 through 108, the remaining claims in the above-identified application, have been withdrawn
from consideration by the examiner as being drawn to a non-elected invention.
Claims 1 and 115 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007