The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROGER FRANET and LARRY NEIL SMITH __________ Appeal No. 2003-0707 Application 09/690,534 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before STAAB, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Roger Franet et al. originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 12. As the examiner has since withdrawn the rejection of claim 12, the appeal as to this claim is hereby dismissed, leaving for review the standing rejections of claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 11. Claim 12 presumably now stands objected to, along with claims 6 through 8, the only other claims pending in the application, as depending from a rejected base claim.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007