Ex Parte Franet et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                          Paper No. 16                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte ROGER FRANET                                  
                                and LARRY NEIL SMITH                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0707                                  
                               Application 09/690,534                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before STAAB, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Roger Franet et al. originally took this appeal from the               
          final rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 12.  As the             
          examiner has since withdrawn the rejection of claim 12, the                 
          appeal as to this claim is hereby dismissed, leaving for review             
          the standing rejections of claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 11.             
          Claim 12 presumably now stands objected to, along with claims 6             
          through 8, the only other claims pending in the application, as             
          depending from a rejected base claim.                                       









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007