Ex Parte Franet et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0707                                                        
          Application 09/690,534                                                      



                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to a self-propelled agricultural                 
          vehicle which is defined in representative claim 1 as follows:              
               1. In a self-propelled agricultural vehicle having a chassis           
          supported on front and rear sets of wheels, and at least one                
          working unit being attached to a side of the chassis by a support           
          arm movable between a lowered working position and a raised                 
          transport position, and an actuator coupled between the chassis             
          and said arm for moving the latter between said working and                 
          transport positions, the improvement comprising: a coupling                 
          structure mounting an inner end of said support arm to said                 
          chassis at a location inwardly of an outer surface of one of said           
          wheels of one of said front and rear sets of wheels; said support           
          arm being so configured and located relative to said one of said            
          front and rear sets of wheels that said working unit is moved to            
          a position occupying space vertically above a respective wheel of           
          said one of said front and rear sets of wheels when said arm is             
          moved to said transport position.                                           
                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 1 through 5 and 9 through 11 stand rejected under 35            
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,715,667           
          to Goman et al. (Goman).                                                    
               Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 13) and answer           
          (Paper No. 14) for the respective positions of the appellants and           
          examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.1                           

               1 In the final rejection (Paper No. 8), claims 1 through 5             
          and 9 also stood rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                 
          anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,280,695 to Nunes, Jr. et al. and           
          claim 12 stood rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                   
          anticipated by Goman.  On consideration of the arguments advanced           
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007