The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID EDWARD KOTECKI
and
KATHERINE LYNN SAENGER
__________
Appeal No. 2003-1300
Application No. 09/643,3721
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 37 and 39 through 49,
which are all the claims pending in the above-identified
1 Contrary to the appellants’ statement under the heading
“RELATED APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES” (appeal brief filed Sep. 21,
2002, paper 12, p. 2), an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002)
was filed in the parent application, namely application
09/037,849 filed Mar. 10, 1998. For completeness, we attach
hereto a copy of the decision rendered in the parent
application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007