Appeal No. 2003-1300 Application No. 09/643,372 Tseng has been cited for an aspect of the invention unrelated to the relationship between the diameter of the neck portion and the diameter of the body portion. For these reasons, we reverse the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of appealed claims 37 and 39 through 49 as unpatentable over Blalock in view of Tseng and Liou. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED Edward C. Kimlin ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Romulo H. Delmendo ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Jeffrey T. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) RHD/kis 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007