Ex Parte ZUEHLKE et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1570                                                        
          Application 08/748,986                                                      



                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to a method of operating a liftcrane.            
          Representative claim 17 reads as follows:                                   
               17. A method of operating a liftcrane that has a boom, first           
          and second hoisting mechanisms and a first rope and a second                
          rope, comprising the steps of:                                              
               a) winding a first end of said first rope on the first                 
          hoisting mechanism;                                                         
               b) winding a first end of said second rope on the second               
          hoisting mechanism;                                                         
               c) coupling a second end of said first rope to a second end            
          of said second rope in a manner that transfers tension equally              
          between said ropes;                                                         
               d) operating the liftcrane to lift a load suspended from the           
          boom and coupled to said first and second ropes by combined                 
          action of the first hoisting mechanism and the second hoisting              
          mechanism wherein both the first and second hoisting mechanisms             
          each lift a substantially equal part of the load and the first              
          and second hoisting mechanisms together lift the entire load;               
               e) sensing the relative amount by which said first ends of             
          said ropes are being taken up and sending a signal indicative of            
          said sensing to a processor having a synchronization routine; and           
               f) adjusting operation of at least one of said hoisting                
          mechanisms based upon said routine operating on said signal from            
          said sensing.                                                               
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Durand                         3,575,300          Apr. 20, 1971             
          Maltby et al. (Maltby)         3,847,251          Nov. 12, 1974             
          Bayer                          5,361,565          Nov.  8, 1994             
          Guerrero,                    2 187 160 A          Sep.  3, 1987             
          British Patent Document                                                     


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007